In recent years, many of the countries follow suit to implement competition law. Are there any differences with regards to the intention to implement competition law? Are they driven by similar lines of reasoning? Many of the previous research shed light on one or two countries reasons for implementing competition law. This article compares and contrasts the similarities and differences with regards to the major motives in implementing competition laws/antitrust laws. We first used content analysis to categorize the reasons for implementation of competition law. After that, the reasons mentioned by official websites and academic journals which lead to the implementation of competition laws in different countries like EU, Japan and China is done.

Authored by Rama Gandhi, NMIMS School Of Law.

Resolution of Abuse of Dominance Cases


The enactment of the Competition Act, 2002 (the Act), the principal legislation governing compe-tition law in India, along with the establishment of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) as its chief enforcement authority, has been one of the biggest game changers in the Indian regulatory space. As with competition regimes in mature jurisdictions, India’s competition law covers the regulation of anticompetitive conduct, abuse of dominance and unilateral conduct, and combi¬nations. This chapter focuses on the enforcement of provisions relating to abusive conduct of enterprises and explores the evolving trends in this area.

Authored by Parth Bathla, FIMT, GGSIPU, Delhi.

Link Legal: India Law Services


State and social power and structure are based on theories and principles of conduct constitute the operation of public law. The National Competition Policy will be the Second Wave of changes that make the competition regime stronger and more efficient. Twenty years ago something was important changes seen in the Indian market. The benefits of the Factor flow control environment are many and are manifested in various areas such as telecom transport and manufacturing.

Authored By Rupa Paul, Amity University, Kolkata.

Intersection between IPR &Competition Law


Under the competition act 2002, the main objective is to prevent any kind of practices which cause adverse effects on the competition in promotion of competition in markets and to protect the interests of the buyers and can even ensure that there is freedom of any trade which is carried on by the participants in the market.

Authored by Nishtha Kheria and Varun Vikas Srivastav, Amity Law School, Noida.